No description
  • Dart 82.7%
  • Python 17.3%
Find a file
Repository files (latest commit first)
Filename Latest commit message Latest commit date
Tag 019423f08f Record what an audit found, including a wrong claim
The table said several frames in one buffer are refused. They are not:
the block loop breaks on the last block and never checks the cursor
against the input length, so a second frame, a trailing skippable frame
and appended junk are all accepted and silently ignored.

Four more, each with a reproducer and none fixed yet. The content size
sizes an allocation with no ceiling, and one flipped bit in a real
tile's descriptor kills the isolate with an error no caller can catch.
The interleaved FSE decode writes three symbols in a pass that checks
room for two. RLE blocks skip the block size ceiling. And the checksum
is never verified, which is the one that makes the others systemic:
34% of 600,000 mutations decoded into wrong bytes in silence.
2026-09-21 23:01:56 -06:00
benchmark Time the decoder across compression levels, interleaved 2026-09-21 22:11:05 -06:00
lib Add a pure-Dart zstd decoder, as a benchmark 2026-09-21 21:37:56 -06:00
test Add a pure-Dart zstd decoder, as a benchmark 2026-09-21 21:37:56 -06:00
tool Add a pure-Dart zstd decoder, as a benchmark 2026-09-21 21:37:56 -06:00
.gitignore Add a pure-Dart zstd decoder, as a benchmark 2026-09-21 21:37:56 -06:00
analysis_options.yaml Add a pure-Dart zstd decoder, as a benchmark 2026-09-21 21:37:56 -06:00
pubspec.yaml Add a pure-Dart zstd decoder, as a benchmark 2026-09-21 21:37:56 -06:00
README.md Record what an audit found, including a wrong claim 2026-09-21 23:01:56 -06:00

pure_zstd

A zstd decompressor in plain Dart, with no native dependency.

It exists because every zstd binding on pub.dev is a wrapper over libzstd, and an app that reads block-compressed elevation tiles on a phone would rather not carry a native library per platform to do it. Decompression only. There is no compressor and there is no plan for one.

This is a feasibility spike, not a finished library. It decodes the real data it was written for, correctly and completely, and it is roughly four times slower than native zstd. See Speed below before depending on it.

Using it

import 'package:pure_zstd/pure_zstd.dart';

final plain = zstdDecode(frame);

// Decoding many frames: hold the decoder, which keeps its entropy tables and
// scratch buffers between calls and then allocates only the output.
final decoder = ZstdDecoder();
for (final frame in frames) {
  use(decoder.decode(frame));
}

A frame that declares no content size needs expectedSize, because the output is allocated whole rather than grown.

What it implements

RFC 8878 is the specification. Of it:

Part of the format State
Frame header, single segment and windowed Decoded. The window descriptor is skipped, since the output is allocated from the content size.
Raw, RLE and compressed blocks All three.
Multi-block frames Yes, including a later block reusing an earlier one's tables and recent offsets.
Raw, RLE, compressed and treeless literals All four, in one-stream and four-stream form.
Huffman weights Both the direct nibble form and the FSE-coded form.
Sequence tables Predefined, RLE, FSE-compressed and repeat, for all three of literal length, match length and offset.
Repeated offsets Yes, including the no-literals shift.
Content checksum Parsed and skipped, never verified.
Dictionaries Refused.
Skippable frames, several frames in one buffer Only a leading skippable frame is refused, and only because the magic check fires. See Known defects.
Streaming, or decoding part of a frame Not offered.

It targets native Dart and not the web: the literals header reads a five-byte field with a 32-bit shift, and the bit reader carries 56 bits in an int. Both are exact on the VM and on AOT, and neither is on JavaScript.

Known defects

Found by two audits on 2026-09-21, confirmed with reproducers, and not yet fixed. Nothing should depend on this package until they are.

  1. Frame_Content_Size sizes the output allocation with no ceiling. A 16-byte frame can ask for 4 EiB. One bit flipped in the frame descriptor of a real tile gives RangeError or OutOfMemoryError, and neither is catchable as ZstdException, so the isolate dies. This is what the skipped Window_Descriptor was for: RFC 8878 §3.1.1.1.2 allows a decoder to refuse a frame asking for more memory than it will give. Require the declared size to be under a stated ceiling, and have the .hgtz reader pass the exact height * width * 2 it expects.
  2. fseDecodeInterleaved writes three symbols in a pass that checks room for two. fse.dart:210 guards on at + 2 > outLimit and the exhausted branch writes a third, so a crafted Huffman weight stream indexes _weights[256]. The reproducer is 53 bytes, and random mutation of a real tile found it independently. The guard wants at + 3.
  3. Several frames in one buffer decode to the first and return silently. The block loop breaks on the last block and nothing compares the cursor with the input length, so a second frame, a trailing skippable frame, and four junk bytes appended are all accepted and ignored. Require the cursor to have reached the end.
  4. RLE blocks skip the block-size ceiling. type != 1 exempts them, so 97 bytes of input returns 44 MB of output that a caller cannot tell from a good tile.
  5. The content checksum is parsed and never verified. Over 600,000 mutations of real block data, 34% decoded into wrong bytes with no error raised. A frame may also claim a checksum and supply none, because the four bytes are stepped over rather than read. hgtz.py writes no checksum either, so a corrupt tile on a phone becomes wrong elevation rather than an error. This is the one that makes the rest systemic: it is the only mechanism that would catch a wrong decode from anything else.

Over-permissive against libzstd, with no wrong output, so lower priority: a compressed block over blockSizeMax is accepted, the Huffman weight table is read with maxSymbol 255 where libzstd uses 12, and Regenerated_Size is capped at a flat 128 KiB rather than min(Window_Size, 128 KiB).

Correctness

The reference is pyzstd, which wraps libzstd. tool/oracle.py extracts every block of a .hgtz container as its own frame, decompresses it with pyzstd, hands it to tool/verify.dart, and compares byte for byte.

./tool/oracle.py path/to/srtm1z/N39W105.hgtz
./tool/oracle.py --every 1700 path/to/srtm1z path/to/srtm3z

As of 2026-09-21 that is 32 real containers, 2,615 blocks and 0.3 GB of output, all identical, spanning both the one and three arc-second sets, every thinned column count from 3601 down to 361, and latitudes from 88 S to 80 N.

dart test needs no Python. It decodes the five blocks of the container in test/fixtures/, whose every sample is a known function of its position, so a wrong decode cannot pass.

Speed

Measured 2026-09-21 on this eight-core Linux box, dart compile exe, Dart 3.12.2. One 256 by 256 block is 131,072 bytes out. The frames are read into memory first, so only decoding is timed, and the figure includes allocating the output buffer because the API allocates it.

Block set pure_zstd, AOT pyzstd (libzstd)
Colorado, N39W105, 196 blocks, median 0.66 ms 0.18 ms
Alaska, N60W160, 98 blocks, median 0.94 ms not measured
One block, repeated 1000 times 0.85 ms 0.22 ms
113 blocks, a 360 degree sweep 67 ms 19 ms

That is 140 to 200 MB/s of output. The JIT is about 25% slower than AOT, so measure with dart compile exe.

The cost is almost all in the sequence loop rather than in Huffman literals. A block of real terrain carries around 1,700 literals and 14,400 sequences, so the hot path is three FSE state updates, six bit reads and a nine-byte match copy, about 46 ns per sequence against native's dozen or so. The headroom left is bounds checks and the byte-at-a-time match copy; widening that copy to 64-bit words, the way libzstd does, is the next thing to try.

Run it yourself:

dart compile exe benchmark/bench.dart -o /tmp/bench && /tmp/bench

Licence

Not chosen yet.

Measured on the target device, 2026-09-21

Sixteen real 256x256 blocks lifted out of path/to/srtm1z/N39W105.hgtz, 131,072 bytes of output each, the same blocks in every row so the numbers are comparable. Median of 960 timed calls after 320 warm-up calls.

where mode median MB/s 113-block sweep
Pixel 10 Pro XL profile, AOT 0.414 ms 302 47 ms
Pixel 10 Pro XL debug, JIT 0.540 ms 231 61 ms
this laptop AOT 0.917 ms 136 104 ms
this laptop JIT 1.125 ms 111 127 ms

The phone is about twice as fast as the laptop at this, which is why the desktop figures in the commit message read worse than reality.

Native, for scale: pyzstd on the laptop is 0.175 ms on comparable blocks. That is a Python C extension rather than Dart FFI, so take it as an indication. No native-on-phone figure was taken.

Do not benchmark against test/fixtures/N51E000.hgtz. Its samples are a synthetic pattern that compresses to almost no sequences, and decode cost tracks sequence count, so it reads about six times too fast. That mistake was made once already.