Commit graph halkyon/deploy/redeploy.sh
Author SHA1 Message Date
53b5d56e79
Keep only the last 3 deploy dumps on the server
They are the way back from a deploy, not backups: those go off-site (3c).
Every file people keep is in each dump, so fewer dumps leave room for more
files (decided 2026-10-02).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
2026-10-02 06:02:14 +02:00
4c2a363160
ci: check the generated code; deploy: migrate before the switch
All checks were successful
CI / check (push) Successful in 5m51s
CI / deploy (push) Successful in 5s
Two of Serverpod's own conventions, as its v4 project template and roles have them.

CI now runs `serverpod generate` (CLI pinned to the server's Serverpod version, like
the template's workflow) and fails if the committed generated code differs from its
output, so a model or endpoint changed without regenerating can't reach main. Checked in
a clean clone: today's code passes, a committed stale generated file fails.

redeploy.sh now applies the migrations in a run of their own, with Serverpod's
maintenance role (--role=maintenance --apply-migrations), after the dump and before
switching to the new server. That run exits with 0 only if the migrations worked, and
each migration is one transaction, so a failing one stops the deploy while the old
server keeps serving; before, the new server applied them at start and would have
crash-looped. Tested on the local stack: a deploy through the new step, and a failing
run (wrong database password) that exits with 1 after six attempts. AGENTS.md says
migrations must keep the old server working until the switch.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
2026-09-30 22:55:24 +02:00
ce2cd42ffe
ci: check every push on sahaquiel and deploy a green main
Some checks failed
CI / check (push) Failing after 3m22s
CI / deploy (push) Has been skipped
Pushes to main were deployed by hand. Now Forgejo Actions runs tool/check.sh on every
push, and a green main deploys learn.halkyon.eu by itself.

The runner (forgejo-runner v13.1.0) runs on sahaquiel as the unprivileged user `runner`,
with jobs directly on the host: containers would take Docker access, which is root on the
production server, and Forgejo warns that host jobs have no isolation from the runner's
user. So its systemd unit (deploy/runner/forgejo-runner.service) provides it: /home and
the Docker socket invisible, Docker's container networks unreachable, no capabilities,
two cores and 3 GB at most, lowest priority. It is registered to this repository only,
with the UUID and token of Forgejo's "Create new runner" (the old `register` is
deprecated); the token reaches it as a systemd credential. The configuration
(deploy/runner/config.yml) was dry-run against v13.1.0, the unit rates 1.8 in
`systemd-analyze security`. CI runs on pushes only: a pull request from a fork would run
its code on the production server.

The deploy job calls deploy/redeploy.sh as `deploy`, through a key that authorized_keys
pins to that script and to connections from sahaquiel itself. The script deploys the
commit CI checked while it is still main's tip, as a fast-forward, only if every new
commit is signed by a key in deploy/allowed-signers (as the deployed checkout lists
them), after dumping the database (the last ten are kept), and fails unless the server
answers afterwards; a failure puts the checkout back. Tested against the local stack:
refusals of a malformed argument, a stale commit, a forged unsigned commit and a
non-fast-forward, a real deploy with its dump, a repeat, and a failed build.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
2026-09-30 21:49:04 +02:00