Commit graph halkyon/packages/halkyon_base_server/test/integration/support
Author SHA1 Message Date
e5b9578916
feat(base): mending a broken SimpleLogin link with the handle and the recovery phrase (ADR 0020, D7)
Someone whose SimpleLogin identity is new to the register but who has an
account ("I already have one") names their handle and proves the
account's recovery phrase; the new identity takes the old one's place.

- `simpleLogin.beginMend(attempt, handle)`: the keys wrapped under the
  phrase's key, the public keys and a nonce, for the account with that
  handle (whatever its case). Only an account with keys and a SimpleLogin
  identity is mended, a link it had, as nobody adds SimpleLogin signed
  out (D10); a handle nobody has, or any other account's, gets a decoy
  from `signInDecoyKey`, the same each time. At most 10 an hour per
  handle and 30 per network.
- `simpleLogin.mend(attempt, proof)`: the phrase's proof for `mendLink`,
  binding the attempt (`mendLinkDigest`, on both sides), so a proof
  relayed from another sign-in links nobody's identity but the device's
  own; checked for the waiting identity first, which leaves the proof
  unspent. Every session of the account ends, in every service, and the
  sign-in stands ten minutes for a change, such as a lost password.
- SimpleLogin needs `SIGN_IN_DECOY_KEY` alone of ADR 0017's three keys
  (`signInDecoyKeyOf`); `addInstanceRoutes` stops a server with a
  SimpleLogin app and without it (`checkSimpleLoginMending`).
- Members ask the register for both; `RemoteRegister` and the instance
  API carry them.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
2026-10-24 09:17:49 +02:00
7c58d23424
feat(base): the changes of SimpleLogin accounts' keys, each with the password and a fresh sign-in (ADR 0020, D20)
Every change takes the password's proof by its own proof key (the
recovery phrase's for a lost password) and a SimpleLogin sign-in of the
last ten minutes on the device (`KeysOwnerProof`, its attempt), as ADR
0017's take the password and a code. The sign-in is checked before the
proof and taken with the change, so a wrong proof leaves it standing and
each sign-in serves one change.

- `keys.set(attempt, setup, handle?)`: the first keys of an account that
  SimpleLogin was added to (anonymous before, or signing in with GitHub
  or a code), with the handle where it has none; the sign-in alone, as
  there is no password to prove yet.
- `keys.changePassword`, `keys.beginPhrase` and `keys.resetPassword` (a
  lost password, with the phrase): every other session ends, in every
  service, as ADR 0017's change has it.
- `keys.setRecoveryKeys`: a new phrase.
- `account.delete(keysProof)`: an account without SRP's verifier deletes
  itself with the proof and the sign-in; `requireOwnerToDelete` no longer
  asks such an account for SRP.
- `newKeysPasswordDigest` on both sides, held to each other by a test; a
  challenge purpose of its own for the phrase's proof while signed in.
- Members ask the register for all of it; `RemoteRegister` and the
  instance API carry the five new operations and the deletion's proof.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
2026-10-24 09:17:49 +02:00
090d901e92
feat(base): SimpleLogin accounts' keys without SRP, signing up in one call (ADR 0020, step 3)
An account that signs in with SimpleLogin keeps its keys under a password
that signs nobody in (D19): `account_password` keeps the password's own
proof key (Ed25519, `passwordProofKey`) in place of SRP's verifier, which
becomes nullable. The migration adds the column and drops the NOT NULL,
nothing else.

- `simpleLogin.signUp(attempt, handle, setup)`: someone new whose identity
  waits under the attempt gets, in one transaction, an account
  (identified), the link, a profile with the handle and the keys; then a
  session (D18). Refused, the identity still waiting, for a setup out of
  range and a handle refused as saving a profile refuses it.
- `simpleLogin.checkHandle(attempt, handle)`: whether someone new could
  take a handle, at most 30 an hour per attempt and 60 per network.
- `simpleLogin.complete` says, for an account, whether it has its keys and
  its handle, and keeps the sign-in ten minutes under its attempt, the
  account as its caller: D20's confirmation for the changes to come.
- `keys.begin`, `keys.unlock`: the keys for a signed-in device once the
  password is proven with its proof key, for a nonce, bound to the base
  URL the device addressed; wrong proofs counted per session as ADR
  0017's.
- An authenticator is enrolled only for a password that signs in.
- Members ask the register for all of it; `RemoteRegister` and the
  instance API carry the four new operations.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
2026-10-24 09:17:48 +02:00
42d06f7ee8
feat(base): signing in with SimpleLogin through the register (ADR 0020, step 2)
The `simpleLogin` endpoint on halkyon_oidc's SimpleLogin preset: `begin`
for the app and platform (the state's marker for the forwarding page), at
most 30 an hour per network; `complete` with SimpleLogin's code, signed out
a session for the account with that SimpleLogin ID, signed in SimpleLogin
added to the caller's account, who becomes identified and anonymous no
longer. Someone new gets no account yet: their identity waits 30 minutes
under the attempt's ID (D16), with a handle suggested from their name,
`anna_mueller` (D17), for the sign-up of step 3.

The register alone holds the instance's SimpleLogin app
(`simpleLoginClientId`, `simpleLoginClientSecret`) and exchanges codes; a
member asks it for both steps and issues its own session. `SIGN_IN_WAYS`
says which ways the register offers, the instance's basics and the ways
in carry `simpleLogin`, GitHub links nobody more where SimpleLogin is
offered, and Learn's and Todo's pruning forgets the unfinished sign-ins
hourly. No migration: the tables are halkyon_oidc's, already in place.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
2026-10-24 09:17:48 +02:00
a253700f8b
test(app): the device's real cryptography meets the register's checks
The register's tests make the device's side from made-up bytes, and the
app's from fakes; nothing held what the device's real cryptography
(libsodium, on isolates) makes to what the register takes. Now
register_interop_test.dart does: a new account's setup passes
isPasswordSetup, the device's SRP answer checks with the register's
srpVerify and its M2 with the device, bound to the instance and the
purpose (another instance's or a change's identity refused), the keys
open as made, a new password passes isNewPassword, and the phrase's proof
for it checks against the phrase's own key, never the account's, with
the device's framing of the message the register's. halkyon_base_server
exports the checks it uses; halkyon_app takes it as a dev dependency.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
2026-10-23 14:12:58 +02:00
92d2df4695
fix(auth)!: the owner's proof is bound to what it approves
A signed-in change's proof covered only its challenge and the instance,
so whoever could read and change the traffic (an http:// instance, a
TLS-intercepting proxy, TLS broken: what SRP is for) could keep the owner's
proof and code and swap in a new password, a recovery phrase or an
authenticator of their own, or turn a proof made for new recovery codes
into a deletion (the full reading's device medium 1).

SRP's identity now also carries what the proof is for and the digest of
what it sets, which the register works out from the call that brings it,
never from the device: a new password (its digest), a new phrase (its
wrapping and proof key), confirming the first or another authenticator and
removing one (its ID), new recovery codes, calling resets off, deleting;
the sessionless reset of an authenticator its own, apart from signing in.
A proof made for one of them counts for no other. Tests made for each
refusal fail with the binding taken out on both sides.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
2026-10-23 14:12:54 +02:00
1ad5d84110
fix(auth)!: proofs are bound to the instance's whole base URL
SRP's identity and the recovery phrase's proof carried the host alone, so
instances on one host under another port, path or scheme could relay each
other's proofs (the full reading's device low 4). Both now carry the base
URL the device addresses, written alike on both sides
(canonicalInstanceUrl: scheme and host in lower case, the port only where
it isn't the scheme's own, the path ending in /); the register takes its
own public scheme, host and port (Serverpod serves at the root), a member
the URL it names, development anything.

The identity also gains a purpose and the digest of what a proof sets,
both empty so far (signing in), with the framing for a new phrase's and an
authenticator's digest beside the new password's: the owner's proofs bind
them next. Cross-tests hold both sides to the same bytes. OwnerProof's and
DeletionProof's host, and every endpoint's, become instanceUrl.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
2026-10-23 14:12:54 +02:00
f0413531ff
fix(auth)!: a first password takes a fresh proof of the account's way in
The fourth reading's first finding: password.set took a session alone,
so whoever took one made a GitHub-only account, or an address account
without a password, theirs for good (their address or password, their
authenticator; GitHub then refused the owner).

- An account with an address proves it anew: a code mailed to that
  address for this (EmailCodePurpose.firstPassword, its own mail), never
  the session alone, a code asked for anything else, or another address.
- An account that signs in with GitHub alone does it within 10 minutes of
  a GitHub sign-in (the session's method and creation time, where the
  session lives; members tell the register), refused signInAgain before
  any code is used; the address it adds is proved as before.
- Anonymous people still become identified with a code to the address
  they add.

The app mails the code to the person's own address (asking for it where
the device doesn't know it), offers a password right after a GitHub
sign-in (D2's "at their next sign-in") before the person's app, and asks
for a GitHub sign-in anew when the instance refuses an older one, keeping
the code typed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
2026-10-23 14:12:50 +02:00
a9459bb875
fix(auth)!: a session alone never gets a code checked
The third reading found a stolen session guessing TOTP codes without end:
nine wrong codes for new recovery codes, then removing an unconfirmed
authenticator of its own, a success that cleared the session's count. As
Proton has it, every signed-in change of how an account is secured now
takes the owner's proof (OwnerProof): the password's SRP proof for a
change's challenge and a TOTP or recovery code. Adding an authenticator
once one is confirmed, removing a confirmed one, new recovery codes, a new
phrase, a new password and deleting take it; only the first authenticator
is confirmed with its own code alone, and removing an unconfirmed one
takes nothing. A proof given where none is taken is refused, and a
confirmed authenticator's code is never checked for a session alone, so
no success passes a proof unchecked.

A session's proofs count for it alone, before they are checked, cleared
only by one accepted; the tenth wrong in a row ends the session. They
never count toward the account's waits nor wait for them, so whoever
knows the password no longer holds a signed-in owner out of changing it
(the second finding), and a new password forgets those waits. Beginning a
change counts nothing against the account (the third finding): 30 an
hour per session, holding back that session alone. Deleting takes a TOTP
code wherever an authenticator is confirmed, a code by mail where no
second factor works (the fourth finding), which SignInWays now tells
(secondFactorWorks). Signed-in calls no longer take the address: nothing
there mails. wrongExistingCode goes, a wrong existing code being a wrong
proof.

The app follows in the next commit.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
2026-10-23 14:12:49 +02:00
1d4320370b
fix(auth): a code by mail serves only what it was asked for
Codes by mail were tied to nothing but their address (the re-review's
seventh finding): a hostile instance could answer that a setup never
finished, have the person type a code into it, relay it to start the real
instance's account reset, and 72 hours later relay a second to finish it
with its own password and keys; the mail said "to sign in" whatever the
code was for. A code is now asked for a purpose (signUp, finishSetup,
authenticatorReset, accountReset, deletion), only that purpose takes it (any
other is refused as no longer valid, leaving the code as it was), and its
mail says what it would do ("to reset your account on learn.halkyon.eu: a
new password and new keys, and what was encrypted with the old ones is
lost") and to type it only in the app on that instance, nowhere else. The
app asks for each code with the purpose of its step.

Migration (module, Learn's and Todo's servers, Learn's device schema):
ALTER TABLE "email_code_request" ADD COLUMN "purpose" text; nullable,
so the requests of the last 15 minutes before it stay, taken by nothing
and forgotten within the hour.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
2026-10-23 14:12:48 +02:00
e8c4a3d472
fix(auth): a session's wrong codes end the session, not the account's codes
Wrong codes for removing an authenticator, new recovery codes or confirming
one counted toward the account's waits (the re-review's third finding): a
stolen session alone, without the password, could keep the owner's codes
waiting for up to a day at a time, renewed without end, holding them out
of signing in and of changing the password, the way to end that session,
and nobody was mailed. Those codes now count per session, where the session
is (the register's own, or a member's, which forwards the code): each try
counted before its code is checked (one statement, so tries sent at once
count each), a code accepted clearing the count, and the tenth wrong in a
row ending the session (sessionEnded; the device says it was signed out).
A try that checked no code (a refusal of something else) is taken back.
The account's waits now count only codes after a right password, and the
per-account ten tries an hour, which a session could fill as well, go.

Migration (module, Learn's and Todo's servers, Learn's device schema):
CREATE TABLE "session_code_failures" ("id" bigserial PRIMARY KEY,
"sessionId" uuid NOT NULL, "authUserId" uuid NOT NULL, "failures"
bigint NOT NULL, "updatedAt" timestamp NOT NULL) with a unique index on
"sessionId": a new table, nothing touched. Its rows go with a code
accepted, with the person, and hourly once their session is gone.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
2026-10-23 14:12:47 +02:00
4a32f150db
fix(auth): codes wait after ten wrong in a row, and the owner is told
Whoever knew the password could guess codes at 10 an hour forever,
unnoticed, each guess checked against every authenticator (the second
reading's M4). Every code an account's second factor refuses after a
right password (sign-in, a phrase's reset, a change) or from a signed-in
device (removing an authenticator, new recovery codes, the code from one
confirmed before) now counts, per account, from every network; after
every tenth in a row no code is taken (codesWait, saying until when), an
hour, then twice as long each time, a day at the most (longestCodeWait,
second_factor_waits.dart): at a day, ten guesses a day still have about a
1 % chance a year against one authenticator, so the first wait mails the
owner that someone knows their password. The instance keeps no address,
so sign-in and the phrase's reset now send the address the device typed
(and its language), used only for that mail after its hash is checked
against the account's. A code accepted clears it all.

Migration (module, Learn's and Todo's servers, Learn's device schema):
CREATE TABLE "second_factor_failures" ("id" bigserial PRIMARY KEY,
"authUserId" uuid NOT NULL, "failures" bigint NOT NULL, "waits"
bigint NOT NULL, "waitUntil" timestamp, "updatedAt" timestamp NOT
NULL) with a unique index on "authUserId": a new table, nothing
touched.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
2026-10-23 14:12:44 +02:00
dab2c80524
fix(auth)!: proofs are bound to the instance the device addresses
Nothing tied a sign-in's proof to the instance it was made for: an
instance a person was lured into adding could pass A, M1 and the code on
to the real register and get a session there, and pass a phrase's proof
on with a password of its own in place of the person's (the second
reading's M6). SRP's identity is now a label, the challenge's ID and
the host the device addressed (passwordIdentity, in halkyon_base_client
and halkyon_base_server alike), and the phrase's proof signs that host,
what it is for (an authenticator's reset or a new password) and the new
password's digest (key proof v2). Every proving call carries the host;
in production it must be the server's apiServer.publicHost (otherwise
otherInstance, which the app shows as an instance it can't trust), in
development any; a member forwards its own. The tests prove that a
relayed sign-in, a proof for another host or purpose, and a swapped
password are refused, nothing changing.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
2026-10-23 14:12:43 +02:00
009970faab
fix(auth): decoy encryption keys are keys a device could have made
An address nobody has got, as the recovery phrase's first step, an
X25519 public key of 32 HMAC bytes, which is a point of Curve25519's
prime-order subgroup one time in sixteen, as every real key is: whoever
checked could tell nearly always whether an address has an account (the
second reading's M1). The decoy's key is now made from a seed, as its
Ed25519 key already was. The tests hold twenty decoys to the curve check
the review used.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
2026-10-23 14:12:43 +02:00
aea0c447fc
fix(auth)!: the recovery phrase is proved by a key of its own
A key proof was a signature by the account's signing key, which every
signed-in device keeps in its keyring: whoever could read one, with a
code from its authenticator, set a new password without the password or
the phrase (the second reading's H1). The phrase now proves itself with
an Ed25519 key derived from its bits alone (halkyon_keys'
recoveryProofKeysOf, KDF context hlkrprf1, a sibling of the recovery
key), whose public half every setup, new phrase and account reset sends
and the register keeps (account_password.recoveryProofKey); the device
derives the secret half only while the phrase is typed. An account
without one (none exist outside development) proves no phrase until it
sets a new one; decoys check against a decoy proof key alike.

Migration (module, Learn's and Todo's servers, Learn's device schema):
ALTER TABLE "account_password" ADD COLUMN "recoveryProofKey" bytea;
nullable, so rows made before keep working and no data is touched.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
2026-10-23 14:12:43 +02:00
f8076dcacf
feat(auth): ways in for accounts without a working password
ADR 0017, step 3. Signing up takes an address a mailed code proves and
a password's setup, without a session (`passwordSignIn.signUp`): an
address nobody has becomes a new identified account, and an account
with the address but no password (codes by mail before; no keys exist,
so nothing waits) takes the password, keeping its ID. A setup never
finished signs in with its password and a code mailed to the address it
began with, until an authenticator is confirmed, which also calls off a
reset of the account waiting; any other account takes no code by mail
in place of its second factor and leaves the code unused. A reset of
the whole account waiting no longer counts as having had an
authenticator, so its owner isn't locked out until it completes.

Members forward both through the register; the tests' shared helpers
move into `support/password_support.dart`.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
2026-10-23 14:12:34 +02:00
a3a8ed3890
feat(auth): a password with TOTP on the register, and resets
The register's side of signing in with an address, a password that never
leaves the device (SRP-6a) and a code from an authenticator (ADR 0017),
with members forwarding every step through AccountRegister:

- password.set: salt, Argon2id's costs, SRP's verifier, the public keys
  and the private keys wrapped twice, all made on the device; with the
  address a mailed code proves, an anonymous person becomes identified
  under their ID. It signs in once an authenticator is confirmed.
- passwordSignIn.begin and complete: SRP's two steps with a TOTP or
  recovery code. An address nobody has is answered from a decoy key as
  an account would be; every wrong credential is refused alike.
- authenticator: secrets sealed under totpKey (XChaCha20-Poly1305, bound
  to their row), each code accepted once, ten recovery codes with the
  first, the last one kept.
- accountRecovery: a lost authenticator reset 72 hours after the
  password and a mailed code or the recovery phrase ask, a lost password
  set anew with the phrase's signature, or the account reset with new
  keys 72 hours after a mailed code asks; a mail at each start, a
  sign-in calling it off.
- An account with a password no longer signs in by a mailed code or
  GitHub; no new GitHub account is linked where passwords are offered,
  and from GITHUB_SIGN_IN_ENDS GitHub signs nobody in and its IDs go.

Five tables, added by the module's migration; deletePerson deletes
their rows.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
2026-10-22 18:11:10 +02:00
65c5cd740d
feat(accounts): one account across an instance's services (ADR 0016)
halkyon_base runs as the instance's register or as one of its members.
The register keeps the ways in, handles and profiles; members ask it
over HTTP with the instance's shared secret (instanceSecret), and open
sessions of their own for its accounts, under the same account ID.

- AccountsMode from the environment: INSTANCE_MEMBERS on the register,
  ACCOUNT_REGISTER_URL on a member. Learn always holds the register
  (Explore joins the profiles); Todo is a member where it is set.
- AccountRegister: LocalRegister, RemoteRegister, an in-memory one in
  tests. Calls between services on the web server, refused without the
  secret (constant-time compare); a server needing it doesn't start
  without it.
- Deleting an account deletes it everywhere: notices per member kept in
  the deletion's transaction (account_deletion_notice), told at once and
  hourly until confirmed; members prune daily whom the register no longer
  knows, never while it knows none of them or can't be reached.
- Deploy: INSTANCE_SECRET and INSTANCE_MEMBERS in compose and .env.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
2026-10-22 18:11:07 +02:00
4107cc3087
refactor(profile): handles and profiles move into halkyon_base
People's public profiles are the instance's register's (ADR 0016), so
the module now holds them: the public_profile table (unchanged, so
Learn's migration records versions only; devices get the table empty,
as they hold every module's tables), the profile and profiles
endpoints under `base`, the handle rules, the link checks and the page
at /@handle, whose foot names the app as the host's configuration says
(profilePageNote). Deleting a person deletes their profile in the
module's core.

Hosts read profiles through the module (profileOf, profilesOf,
personWithHandle, fixHandle; saveProfile for their tests), behind an
AccountRegister that is this server's own database for now. Learn's
feedback, discussions and publishing ask it; publishing fixes the
handle just before it writes the release, outside its transaction.
Explore still joins the table in its search, so Learn holds the
register wherever it runs. Learn's app calls the module's endpoints;
a profile not found is ProfileNotFoundException. Todo's database gets
the table too (it was never deployed).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
2026-10-22 18:11:07 +02:00
e23cc77f7c
halkyon_app: instances, sign-in and sync plumbing for Halkyon's apps
What every Halkyon app's shell needs, taken from Halkyon Learn's and set
on halkyon_base's client: the instances a device keeps an account on,
the first start's tiles and where an instance keeps people's data, the
account switcher; signing in anonymously, with GitHub or an email code,
switching person and the start screen; the gates that build an app's
dependencies per instance and per person; and the sync service with its
status, Settings card and banner. Texts of its own in English and
German take the app's name; what only the app can say, it passes in.
Fakes for apps' tests are in testing.dart.

An instance's basics now name the app it serves (`app`, set by the
host's configuration), and an app accepts only an instance of its own.
SerialQueue and CoalescingRunner move into halkyon_core.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
2026-10-19 15:31:40 +02:00
af1de799f4
halkyon_base: a Serverpod module for sign-in, accounts and instance basics
What every Halkyon server has, taken from Halkyon Learn's: anonymous,
GitHub and email-code sign-in with their endpoints, an account's ways
in and its deletion, the pruning of abandoned anonymous people, of
sign-up attempts and of expired codes, and the instance's basics (the
sign-in ways offered, the source link, the minimum app build, where
people's data and its backups are). Endpoints sit under the nickname
`base`. A host configures it in one place before its pod starts: its
name for the mails, its source link, its minimum build, and hooks that
delete its own data with a person.

The tables keep Learn's names, columns and indexes, so a host moving
onto the module migrates nothing but version rows. Server package under
the SSPL, client under the AGPL, as Learn's are.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
2026-10-19 14:29:28 +02:00