ADR 0017's "Full reading (21 Oct 2026)": each server finding and what was
done (H1, M1, M2, M3, L1, L4, L5, L6, L7, L10), those accepted with their
reasons (L2, L3, L8, L9), and the device's M1, the owner's proof bound to
its operation and the whole base URL, still to do. "The rules as they
stand" brought up to date; the module README and Learn's AGENTS.md too.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
The full reading's L10: issueSessionAfter refused a member clock more than
five seconds behind the register's, but one running ahead without bound,
so sessions made on the member in the gap before a reset's moment
outlived the register's notice. Now a clock that far ahead is refused
alike (PasswordRefusal.passwordChanged: the reset is done, the device
signs in again), with a warning to set both clocks by NTP.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
The full reading's L7: a member deleted at the register only for a session
with the identified scope, so a person the register had linked whose
becoming identified on the member failed was deleted on the member on the
session alone, their account left at the register. Now the member asks the
register whether the person is its account (knownAccounts) and, if so,
deletes there with the proof it takes; else, here alone. While the
register is out of reach, nothing is deleted.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
The full reading's L4: password.set replacing the password of a setup never
finished (no authenticator confirmed yet) ended no session, against the
rule that every new password ends the account's other sessions. Now it
ends them all but the session asking, here and on every member (as a
change does; keepSession, which a member forwards).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
The full reading's L1: the warning that ten wrong proofs ended a session is
there for the owner to learn of it, and any other session of the account
(another app on the same stolen phone) dismissed it. Now only a session
made after the warning dismisses it (signed in again, or the sign-in that
first shows it); an older one is refused (PasswordRefusal.signedInBefore,
its own text in English and German), and a new password clears it as
before. A member tells the register when its session asking was made.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
The full reading's L5: every change or reset of a password told the
members inside the request, up to 500 notices one after another with a
timeout of 10 seconds each, so a member out of reach held the change up
for minutes. Now announceSessionsEnded tells the members of this account's
notices alone, in the background on a session of its own; those not
confirmed wait for the hourly run as before.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
The full reading's M1 and L6: once GitHub IDs were forgotten at
GITHUB_SIGN_IN_ENDS, an account that had signed in with GitHub alone
counted as anonymous, so a stolen session and any mailbox gave it a first
password and authenticator; and such accounts, with no way in left, were
never pruned. Now:
- at the end, the daily run that forgets the GitHub IDs first deletes the
accounts that sign in with GitHub alone (no address, so never a
password), with everything they have, members told (deletePerson); the
app tells them for the three months before that their account goes then
unless they set up a password (passwordSectionGitHubEndsDeletes, en/de);
- password.set adds an address without GitHub only for someone anonymous
where the session lives (anonymousHere, which a member tells the
register, as it tells freshGitHubSignIn); anyone else is refused before
any code is used.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
The full reading's H1: an owner could be kept from calling a reset off, and
the reset then went through. Whoever knew the password and had the mailbox
asked an authenticators' reset and kept the codes waiting, so the owner's
sign-ins were refused until it took effect; whoever had the mailbox filled
the address's proofs ceiling from three networks and completed an account
reset. Now every hold-out of the owner after a reset was asked (a wait
that begins, an attempt a wait refuses, a sign-in or proof refused by the
address's ceiling) moves the account's resets not carried out to take
effect no sooner than 72 hours after it ends (pushOutResets). A reset
carried out (the password alone signing in until an authenticator is
confirmed) is never pushed, nor a lapsed one brought back.
Signed-in devices are told too: SignInWays carries when a waiting reset
of each kind takes effect, the account section shows them with Call it
off, which takes the owner's proof (password and code; password.
callOffResets, forwarded by members) and calls every reset off, as no wait
holds a signed-in owner's proof back. Texts in English and German.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
The full reading's M3: whoever knows the password made the account's codes
wait, and that wait refused the phrase's owner their reset too, so they were
held out of both without end. Codes now count per account and per way they
came (SecondFactorPath: after the password, after the phrase), each with
its own waits; a code accepted either way clears both.
Migration (module, Learn's and Todo's servers; Learn's device schema
rebuilds the server-only table):
DROP INDEX "second_factor_failures_person_idx";
ALTER TABLE "second_factor_failures" ADD COLUMN "path" text NOT NULL
DEFAULT 'password'::text;
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX "second_factor_failures_person_idx" ON
"second_factor_failures" USING btree ("authUserId", "path");
Existing rows are the password's, unique per account, so unique per
account and way too.
Also the hosts' generated future calls, for the pruning's doc comment the
lapsed resets' commit changed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
The full reading's M2: a reset of the authenticators asked and forgotten
left the account to the password alone for good, and an account's reset
could be carried out a year after it was asked. Now a reset that took
effect and wasn't carried out lapses a week later, as never asked: the
password alone no longer signs in, a code still does, and asked again it
waits anew with a new mail. A reset of the authenticators carried out never
lapses (the password alone signs in until one is confirmed). The daily
pruning forgets lapsed rows (forgetLapsedResets).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
A password sign-in whose account carries the warning (a session ended
for ten wrong proofs in a row) shows it before the sign-in is put in
place: when, what it means, and to change the password if it wasn't
the owner. Dismiss clears it on the instance through the held-back
session; Remind me later signs in and keeps it. The account section
shows it above the change of password, with Dismiss, while it stands.
Nothing identifies the session or its device.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
The tenth wrong owner proof in a row ends a session (the third
reading); someone holding that session tried the password or its
codes. The register now keeps the moment with the account's password
(`account_password.sessionEndedForProofsAt`): the account's sign-in
ways and its next password sign-in carry it, until the owner dismisses
it (`password.dismissSessionEndedWarning`, their session alone: it
hides a warning and secures nothing) or sets a new password. A member
ending its own session tells the register
(`noteSessionEndedForProofs`); a register out of reach leaves the
owner unwarned, the session ended all the same.
Migration (module, Learn's and Todo's servers, Learn's device schema):
ALTER TABLE "account_password" ADD COLUMN "sessionEndedForProofsAt"
timestamp without time zone; nullable, so every row keeps its values
and has no warning.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
ADR 0017 records what the fourth reading found and what was done, and
states who changes what of an account with which proofs, as a table the
full reading can check against; the module README and Learn's AGENTS.md
follow.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
Two of the fourth reading's lows:
- A signed-in proof whose call to the register failed
(RegisterUnavailableException, a member's call timing out after the
register checked it) stays counted against the session, rather than
taken back: a guess never goes uncounted.
- A sign-up code also gives an existing account with that address its
first password, which its mail now says in the subject too ("create an
account or give it a password").
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
The fourth reading's second finding: a stolen session outlived the reset
of the authenticators (carrying it out ended no session) and confirmed
the account's first authenticator on its own code alone, ahead of the
owner, so the owner's confirmation and sign-in were refused after.
- Carrying out a reset of the authenticators ends every session of the
account, on the register at once and on every member by notice, as the
other resets do; the sign-in that carries it out gets its session after
that moment (PasswordProof.sessionsEndedBefore, issueSessionAfter).
- Confirming the first authenticator takes the password's proof for a
change's challenge, without a code (proveOwnersPassword), counted per
session as the owner's proofs are: a session of a lost phone, or of a
setup never finished, claims no second factor.
The app sends the password with every confirmation: the sign-up's, a
reset's and the account section's (which asks for it), and a sign-in's
own unlock where the session is still held back.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
The fourth reading's first finding: password.set took a session alone,
so whoever took one made a GitHub-only account, or an address account
without a password, theirs for good (their address or password, their
authenticator; GitHub then refused the owner).
- An account with an address proves it anew: a code mailed to that
address for this (EmailCodePurpose.firstPassword, its own mail), never
the session alone, a code asked for anything else, or another address.
- An account that signs in with GitHub alone does it within 10 minutes of
a GitHub sign-in (the session's method and creation time, where the
session lives; members tell the register), refused signInAgain before
any code is used; the address it adds is proved as before.
- Anonymous people still become identified with a code to the address
they add.
The app mails the code to the person's own address (asking for it where
the device doesn't know it), offers a password right after a GitHub
sign-in (D2's "at their next sign-in") before the person's app, and asks
for a GitHub sign-in anew when the instance refuses an older one, keeping
the code typed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
A notification shows a mail's subject alone, and the subject said only
"K7QX-M2PD is your Halkyon Learn code" whatever the code would do (the
third reading). The subject now says it: to create an account, finish
setting it up, switch off the authenticator, reset or delete the account.
The sign-up mail also says that the code gives a password to an account
that has the address and none yet, as signing up does.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
The app's side of the owner's proof (OwnerProof, the third reading): adding
an authenticator once one is confirmed, removing a confirmed one and new
recovery codes now ask for the current password beside the code, as
changing the password, a new phrase and deleting already did; one
challenge and one answer per sheet (OwnerAnswer). A wrong password or code
reads as the one refusal the instance gives.
Deleting chooses a code by mail from what the instance says
(secondFactorWorks), no longer from whether an authenticator was ever
confirmed: with the authenticators' reset taken effect but not carried
out, the app offered a code field the instance refused (the fourth
finding). Signed-in calls take no address any more, so a device that
doesn't know it changes the password as any other; deleting by mail asks
for the address only where the device doesn't know it, as the code goes
there (the fifth finding).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
The third reading found a stolen session guessing TOTP codes without end:
nine wrong codes for new recovery codes, then removing an unconfirmed
authenticator of its own, a success that cleared the session's count. As
Proton has it, every signed-in change of how an account is secured now
takes the owner's proof (OwnerProof): the password's SRP proof for a
change's challenge and a TOTP or recovery code. Adding an authenticator
once one is confirmed, removing a confirmed one, new recovery codes, a new
phrase, a new password and deleting take it; only the first authenticator
is confirmed with its own code alone, and removing an unconfirmed one
takes nothing. A proof given where none is taken is refused, and a
confirmed authenticator's code is never checked for a session alone, so
no success passes a proof unchecked.
A session's proofs count for it alone, before they are checked, cleared
only by one accepted; the tenth wrong in a row ends the session. They
never count toward the account's waits nor wait for them, so whoever
knows the password no longer holds a signed-in owner out of changing it
(the second finding), and a new password forgets those waits. Beginning a
change counts nothing against the account (the third finding): 30 an
hour per session, holding back that session alone. Deleting takes a TOTP
code wherever an authenticator is confirmed, a code by mail where no
second factor works (the fourth finding), which SignInWays now tells
(secondFactorWorks). Signed-in calls no longer take the address: nothing
there mails. wrongExistingCode goes, a wrong existing code being a wrong
proof.
The app follows in the next commit.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
When a member's clock ran more than its allowance behind the register's,
the session after a reset was refused as unavailable (the re-review's tenth
finding), after the register had already reset the account and ended every
session, and the app read it as "this instance has no password sign-in".
It now has a refusal of its own (passwordChanged): the app says the password
was changed and to sign in again with the new one.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
An account whose setup never finished, or whose authenticators' reset took
effect, could not delete itself (the re-review's eighth finding): deletion
asked for a TOTP or recovery code it had no way to give. Such an account
now deletes itself with the password's proof and a code by mail to its
address asked for deleting (EmailCodePurpose.deletion, which nothing else
takes), the address checked against the account's as everywhere after the
password; an account whose second factor works still takes a code from it.
The app's deletion sheet asks for the password and mails the code there,
then takes it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
Codes by mail were tied to nothing but their address (the re-review's
seventh finding): a hostile instance could answer that a setup never
finished, have the person type a code into it, relay it to start the real
instance's account reset, and 72 hours later relay a second to finish it
with its own password and keys; the mail said "to sign in" whatever the
code was for. A code is now asked for a purpose (signUp, finishSetup,
authenticatorReset, accountReset, deletion), only that purpose takes it (any
other is refused as no longer valid, leaving the code as it was), and its
mail says what it would do ("to reset your account on learn.halkyon.eu: a
new password and new keys, and what was encrypted with the old ones is
lost") and to type it only in the app on that instance, nowhere else. The
app asks for each code with the purpose of its step.
Migration (module, Learn's and Todo's servers, Learn's device schema):
ALTER TABLE "email_code_request" ADD COLUMN "purpose" text; nullable,
so the requests of the last 15 minutes before it stay, taken by nothing
and forgotten within the hour.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
Neither the account's reset nor the authenticators' reset, carried out,
cleared the account's refused codes (the re-review's sixth finding): after
the owner's way out, the new authenticator's codes could still meet a wait
of up to a day, and the doubling went on. Both now delete them with the
authenticators they were tried against.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
Whoever guessed codes decided whether the owner was mailed (the re-review's
fourth finding): the address a sign-in sent was optional, so a guesser left
it out and no mail went, and a wait begun without a mail used up the one
mail there was. Every call carrying a code after the password or the phrase
proved (signing in, the phrase's reset, a change of password, a new phrase,
deletion) now takes the account's address and the language of its mails,
and is refused (wrongCredentials, as anything wrong after the password)
before any code is checked when the address isn't the account's; every
wait mails the owner, not only the first. The app sends the address the
person typed, or for changes while signed in the one this device signed in
with, and says so where it doesn't know it (addressUnknown).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
Wrong codes for removing an authenticator, new recovery codes or confirming
one counted toward the account's waits (the re-review's third finding): a
stolen session alone, without the password, could keep the owner's codes
waiting for up to a day at a time, renewed without end, holding them out
of signing in and of changing the password, the way to end that session,
and nobody was mailed. Those codes now count per session, where the session
is (the register's own, or a member's, which forwards the code): each try
counted before its code is checked (one statement, so tries sent at once
count each), a code accepted clearing the count, and the tenth wrong in a
row ending the session (sessionEnded; the device says it was signed out).
A try that checked no code (a refusal of something else) is taken back.
The account's waits now count only codes after a right password, and the
per-account ten tries an hour, which a session could fill as well, go.
Migration (module, Learn's and Todo's servers, Learn's device schema):
CREATE TABLE "session_code_failures" ("id" bigserial PRIMARY KEY,
"sessionId" uuid NOT NULL, "authUserId" uuid NOT NULL, "failures"
bigint NOT NULL, "updatedAt" timestamp NOT NULL) with a unique index on
"sessionId": a new table, nothing touched. Its rows go with a code
accepted, with the person, and hourly once their session is gone.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
The ceiling of 30 proofs an hour per address was looked at only when a
sign-in began and counted only wrong passwords (the re-review's second
finding): sign-ins begun ahead from many networks got 60 wrong passwords
checked in an hour, and a right password, not counted, could be told from
a wrong one by whether the next sign-in still began. Every proof for an
address, of a password or of the recovery phrase, is now recorded before it
is checked, whatever its outcome, and refused past 30 an hour
(tooManyAttempts); the check at begin stays as an early refusal.
A change's proof is no longer counted toward the address (the fifth
finding: strangers' wrong passwords held a signed-in owner out of changing
the password, a new phrase and deletion). Its challenge has a purpose of
its own (change), counted per account as it begins (10 an hour), taken by
no sign-in, and a change takes no sign-in's challenge.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
Codes sent at once were all checked before the tenth refused began a wait
(the re-review's first finding: 30 codes from three networks, all checked),
so whoever knew the password could open sign-ins ahead and guess far more
than ten before codes waited. Every attempt at a code for an account is now
counted before its code is checked, one at a time per account (a
transaction holding an advisory lock on the account's key), and the tenth
in a row begins the wait as it is counted: of codes sent at once at most
ten are checked, the rest refused (codesWait). A code accepted clears it
all, that wait too.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
A session alone deleted any account, with everything encrypted under its
keys (the second reading's lows; decided by the developer: the password
and a code, as a change of password takes). account.delete now takes a
DeletionProof (the password's SRP proof for a beginChange challenge, a
TOTP or recovery code, the host the device addressed); the register
checks it (requireOwnerToDelete), a member passing it on bound to its own
host. Accounts without a password, anonymous ones among them, delete with
their session as before. In the app, deleting an account with a password
asks for it and a code in a sheet of its own; a wrong one deletes
nothing.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
One household's line or one server gets a whole /64 of IPv6 addresses,
and could turn through them past every per-network limit (the second
reading's M5). networkOf now counts an IPv6 visitor by their /64
(networkKeyOf), an IPv4 visitor by their address as before.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
Whoever knew the password could guess codes at 10 an hour forever,
unnoticed, each guess checked against every authenticator (the second
reading's M4). Every code an account's second factor refuses after a
right password (sign-in, a phrase's reset, a change) or from a signed-in
device (removing an authenticator, new recovery codes, the code from one
confirmed before) now counts, per account, from every network; after
every tenth in a row no code is taken (codesWait, saying until when), an
hour, then twice as long each time, a day at the most (longestCodeWait,
second_factor_waits.dart): at a day, ten guesses a day still have about a
1 % chance a year against one authenticator, so the first wait mails the
owner that someone knows their password. The instance keeps no address,
so sign-in and the phrase's reset now send the address the device typed
(and its language), used only for that mail after its hash is checked
against the account's. A code accepted clears it all.
Migration (module, Learn's and Todo's servers, Learn's device schema):
CREATE TABLE "second_factor_failures" ("id" bigserial PRIMARY KEY,
"authUserId" uuid NOT NULL, "failures" bigint NOT NULL, "waits"
bigint NOT NULL, "waitUntil" timestamp, "updatedAt" timestamp NOT
NULL) with a unique index on "authUserId": a new table, nothing
touched.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
Anyone who knew an address could spend its whole hour: 10 sign-ins, 5
phrase proofs and 3 codes, each new code voiding the last (the second
reading's M3). Now:
- sign-ins begun count per address and network (10 an hour), phrase
proofs likewise (5), and networks as before (30);
- failed proofs count per address from every network: past 30 an hour
(wrong passwords, phrases' signatures by another key, an address nobody
has alike) no sign-in or proof begins for it anywhere, so guessing from
many networks makes at most 30 guesses an hour, while holding an owner
out takes failing without end from at least three; longer windows
would outlive the hourly pruning of the limits' notes;
- a signed-in change of password begins 10 times an hour per account;
- codes by mail count per address and network (3 an hour), per address
from every network (10, no mailbox flooded) and per network (10), and
up to 3 are valid at once, a fourth voiding the oldest, so codes others
ask for don't void the one its owner is typing.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
Three of the second reading's lows:
- A member waits at most 5 seconds (maxClockSkew) for the register's
moment before making a session after a reset; a clock further behind
is refused at once (unavailable, logged), rather than holding the
request for as long as the clocks differ.
- instanceSecret, which lets a service set passwords and delete accounts
for anyone, stops the server when set shorter than 32 characters, as
the password keys do.
- A change of password, a reset keeping the keys and a new phrase each
write their own columns alone (writeNewPassword, columns: in
setRecoveryKeys), so one made from the row as it was before another
never undoes it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
Data keys were sealed to the account as anonymous sealed boxes, and the
register knows every account's public key: it could have sealed a key of
its own under an existing key ID, and a device would have encrypted new
content with a key the register holds (the second reading's M7, latent
until step 4 encrypts anything). sealDataKey now signs the box, with the
account it is sealed to and a label, by the sealer's Ed25519 key, and
openDataKey checks that signature against the sealer it expects (the
account itself, or whoever shared the store) before opening anything.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
The register can't check a password it never sees, and should its
database leak, the verifier and the keys wrapped under the password fall
to guessing at Argon2id's cost (the second reading's M8). Devices now
refuse a new password shorter than 12 characters, counted as code points
once normalised (halkyon_keys' checkNewPassword), at sign-up, a reset
keeping the keys and a change alike, before anything is derived; the new
password's field says so, and the refusal has its own text (en, de).
Signing in takes any length, so a password set before keeps working.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
Nothing tied a sign-in's proof to the instance it was made for: an
instance a person was lured into adding could pass A, M1 and the code on
to the real register and get a session there, and pass a phrase's proof
on with a password of its own in place of the person's (the second
reading's M6). SRP's identity is now a label, the challenge's ID and
the host the device addressed (passwordIdentity, in halkyon_base_client
and halkyon_base_server alike), and the phrase's proof signs that host,
what it is for (an authenticator's reset or a new password) and the new
password's digest (key proof v2). Every proving call carries the host;
in production it must be the server's apiServer.publicHost (otherwise
otherInstance, which the app shows as an instance it can't trust), in
development any; a member forwards its own. The tests prove that a
relayed sign-in, a proof for another host or purpose, and a swapped
password are refused, nothing changing.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
An address nobody has got, as the recovery phrase's first step, an
X25519 public key of 32 HMAC bytes, which is a point of Curve25519's
prime-order subgroup one time in sixteen, as every real key is: whoever
checked could tell nearly always whether an address has an account (the
second reading's M1). The decoy's key is now made from a seed, as its
Ed25519 key already was. The tests hold twenty decoys to the curve check
the review used.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
A key proof was a signature by the account's signing key, which every
signed-in device keeps in its keyring: whoever could read one, with a
code from its authenticator, set a new password without the password or
the phrase (the second reading's H1). The phrase now proves itself with
an Ed25519 key derived from its bits alone (halkyon_keys'
recoveryProofKeysOf, KDF context hlkrprf1, a sibling of the recovery
key), whose public half every setup, new phrase and account reset sends
and the register keeps (account_password.recoveryProofKey); the device
derives the secret half only while the phrase is typed. An account
without one (none exist outside development) proves no phrase until it
sets a new one; decoys check against a decoy proof key alike.
Migration (module, Learn's and Todo's servers, Learn's device schema):
ALTER TABLE "account_password" ADD COLUMN "recoveryProofKey" bytea;
nullable, so rows made before keep working and no data is touched.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
A sign-in with the password alone, once a reset of the authenticators
took effect, left a reset of the account waiting: whoever read the
owner's mail could ask for one while the owner waited, and carry it out
after the owner was back (the second reading's M2).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
An impostor instance refused; a lost authenticator's reset by the
recovery phrase; the password alone signing in once a reset took
effect, an authenticator set up first; starting an account's reset
without the phrase, and finishing one with new keys and a new phrase;
in the account section, removing an authenticator (a code, never the
last), new recovery codes, and a change of password refused for a wrong
current one.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
Signing in (a code, a recovery code, an account never finished, a lost
authenticator by mail and by phrase, an impostor instance, no
connection), setting up (signing up, a password for someone signed in,
finishing an account's reset with new keys or the old), getting back in
(with the phrase, starting a reset without it) and the account section
(what keeps the account, its steps, adding an authenticator, a new
phrase), each as the states it emits.
They found that reading what keeps the account wrapped two refusals at
once in a ParallelWaitError, which no caller takes for one: offline, the
account section showed nothing. The first refusal now goes up as it is.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
PasswordKdf.fromJson refused costs below the floor but took any above it,
so an instance could ask a device for 100 GiB and crash the app at every
sign-in. It now refuses more than the register's own ceiling (16 passes,
1 GiB; KeyRefusal.excessivePasswordKdf), and the app reads either refusal,
before deriving or sending anything, as PasswordProblem.unsafeCosts with
a text of its own (before, costs below the floor read as keys missing).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
password.setRecoveryKeys took a session and a TOTP code alone, so a phone
signed in with its authenticator beside it could set a phrase of its
holder's own and, through the phrase's reset, a new password, never
knowing the old one. It now takes the old password's SRP proof (from
beginChange, the caller's own) and a TOTP or recovery code, as changing
the password does: one owner proof for both (_proveOwner), forwarded by
members, asked for in the account section's New recovery phrase.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
ADR 0017's step-3 section: codes by mail sign nobody in, the ways in
for accounts without a working password, changes while signed in,
sessions ended in every service, the apps' screens (the QR package and
the alternatives considered), the keys in the keyring, anonymous
people's keys waiting for step 4, and libsodium on devices (results
copied before they leave an isolate; a C compiler and make for every
build). The module's and halkyon_app's READMEs and the AGENTS files say
the same; the snap's build installs make for sodium's build hook.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
ADR 0017, step 3 (D4: nobody signs in with email codes yet, so the
password replaces them outright). `emailCode.verifyCode`,
`emailSignIn.signIn` and the switch token go, with the register's
`verifySignInCode` and `completeEmailSwitch` and their operations
between services. `emailCode.sendCode` stays, now without a session
(signing up and getting back in have none), as what proves an address
for a password's setup, a sign-up, a setup never finished and the
resets; `accountRecovery.sendCode`, which did that for the resets,
goes. The `switchChallengeId` column stays: Serverpod's challenges
still link a completion token, and older servers read it during a
deploy.
The apps: halkyon_app's email sign-in (its bloc, sheet, gateway calls
and the start screen's Continue with email) goes; Learn's profile and
Todo's account sheet show `AccountSecuritySection` (a password set up
by someone anonymous or signing in with GitHub, whose end it names;
the authenticators; changing the password; new recovery codes and
phrase), which reads anew after every change the repository makes.
BREAKING CHANGE: Learn's `minimumAppBuild` is 22: builds up to 21 sign
in with the endpoints that went. Todo was never released and stays at
build 1.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
ADR 0017, step 3: widget tests driving the sheets as a person would,
on halkyon_app's fakes: signing in with a code (a wrong one refused
alike), an account never finished signing in with a code by mail and
setting up its authenticator (QR code, key, recovery codes saved), a
lost authenticator's reset, creating an account (the phrase shown and
three of its words checked before anything reaches the instance), the
recovery phrase getting back in, and the account section (a password
offered to someone anonymous; an authenticator added only with a code
from one before; the password changed).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
ADR 0017, step 3: halkyon_app's side, which Learn and Todo take.
- The account's cryptography on the device (`SodiumAccountCrypto`):
halkyon_keys and SRP's client half, each step on an isolate of its
own. sodium hands out results as views of native memory its
finalizers free once the isolate that made them ends, so everything
crossing back is copied first: a view read freed memory and crashed
the process.
- `PasswordGateway` on the module's endpoints (steps without a session
through a client holding none; an authenticator set up with a session
granted but not yet the device's), and `PasswordRepository` running
the flows: signing in (M2 checked, the keys opened before anything is
trusted), signing up, a password for someone signed in, an account
never finished, the authenticators, recovery codes, changing the
password, a new recovery phrase, and getting back in.
- The unlocked keys in the system's keyring per instance and person
(`SecureAccountKeyStore`), gone once another person signs in or
nobody, and with the instance's removal.
- The screens: the start screen's Sign in and Create an account (and
when GitHub sign-in ends), the sign-in sheet (codes, recovery codes,
an account never finished, a lost authenticator), the account's setup
(the recovery phrase shown once, three random words typed back before
anything reaches the instance; the authenticator's QR code, drawn
with pub.dev's qr; the recovery codes), getting back in, and the
account section (`AccountSecuritySection`).
- `FileSaver` moves from Learn into halkyon_app, for the phrase and the
codes in Todo too; `AppDependencies` names it and `passwords`.
- halkyon_keys rebuilds account keys from the secret keys a device kept;
the key proof's message is in halkyon_base_client, checked against
the register's.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
