A second feature needs it: discussions name their writers as reports and
suggestions do, by what their public profile shows.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
The app's side of stage 4 (ADR 0005, rule 11). The card's Report sheet
offers "Send to the author too" on a card from a release; a copy's menu
reports the studyset as a whole and lists what is reported and
suggested on it, as Explore's summary does; the editors of cards, notes
and steps suggest them to the author as the learner has them, never
under "no derivatives". The Profile tab holds the inbox: the threads on
the person's published studysets and those they wrote, the newest
activity first, with a count on the tab. A thread shows a suggestion
beside the author's own item and its replies; its writer and the author
reply, and the author accepts (the content becomes their own edit, its
files fetched from the writer's), declines, closes, hides or blocks.
Writing needs an identity; reading what is public doesn't.
ADR 0005 gets an addendum for stage 4.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01MMm7usAo6q9ZZRoPkWjoxi
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
