- Deleting an identified account whose security can't be read (the
instance out of reach) says so and deletes nothing; it went on to a
deletion by the session alone, refused for an account with a password,
and the person saw a spinner, then nothing. A refusal still leaves the
session's own deletion.
- InstanceChoice's sharesStorage is required, so no app leaves it out and
removes a folder another instance uses.
- A PasswordUnlock forgotten is spent: its secrets read again fail
(StateError) rather than make a proof or a wrapping of zeros.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
On Apple's systems a keychain read finds only the entries of its own
accessibility, so forgetting everyone's keys but one person's missed those
builds before had kept with the default or first_unlock_this_device: they
stayed after signing out, a switch of person or removing the instance (the
short reading's L5). forgetAllBut now also reads the keyring with every
accessibility a build used and deletes each entry found by name, which a
delete finds whatever its accessibility; one that can't be read now holds
back none of the others. The repository's forgetting, run as the person
changes and not awaited, catches a keyring that can't be read (a locked
device), where its error went unhandled.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
The reading of the full reading's fixes noted that the main isolate's
copies of SRP's x and the key-encryption key, Dart's own bytes, stayed
for as long as the sign-in sheet's cubit lived, and after every change's
proof.
PasswordUnlock.forget zeroes them: the sign-in cubit wipes what the
password unlocked once signed in, once another password replaced it, and
as it closes; a change's or deletion's proof wipes what it unlocked once
its answer is made. The fake crypto's proof copies its bytes, as a real
one is new bytes. halkyon_keys' README says what is wiped and what isn't.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
The reading of the full reading's fixes found that SignInWaysState kept
Equatable's default text, which debug builds log with the address, and
that an unreadable sign_in.json logged its FormatException, whose message
holds the file's text; and that the account section's Delete caught only
refusals, so a keyring that couldn't be read escaped and the tap did
nothing.
The state says only whether an address is kept; the file's error logs its
type alone. Reading what keeps the account counts the keys as not here
where the keyring can't be read, and Delete goes on whatever the reading
met, failing as the session bloc says if it must.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
The reading of the full reading's fixes found that first_unlock_this_device
left the account's private keys readable on a locked phone once it had
been unlocked after starting, which is what forensic tools extract from a
stolen one; and that, the accessibility being part of every keychain
lookup, an entry kept with another class stayed unseen and made the next
write fail as a duplicate, so that person couldn't finish signing in on
that device.
As the developer decided, the keys are kept unlocked_this_device (still
never in a backup nor in iCloud Keychain); nothing decrypts with them
while the device is locked. Keeping keys deletes the entry first, which a
delete finds whatever its class.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
The register's tests make the device's side from made-up bytes, and the
app's from fakes; nothing held what the device's real cryptography
(libsodium, on isolates) makes to what the register takes. Now
register_interop_test.dart does: a new account's setup passes
isPasswordSetup, the device's SRP answer checks with the register's
srpVerify and its M2 with the device, bound to the instance and the
purpose (another instance's or a change's identity refused), the keys
open as made, a new password passes isNewPassword, and the phrase's proof
for it checks against the phrase's own key, never the account's, with
the device's framing of the message the register's. halkyon_base_server
exports the checks it uses; halkyon_app takes it as a dev dependency.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
flutter_secure_storage's default accessibility on iOS and macOS
(unlocked) lets keychain items into encrypted backups, which restore on
another device. The account's unlocked keys are now kept
first_unlock_this_device (macOS through its data protection keychain, the
package's default there), and never synchronised to iCloud Keychain.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
An instance's salt of another length made the device's cryptography throw
an ArgumentError, a wrapping's nonce a RangeError, and libsodium or the
keyring may throw their own; none was a refusal, so the step's error
escaped and the sheet stayed busy, which can't be closed. halkyon_keys
now checks the lengths of what comes from elsewhere before libsodium sees
it (KeyRefusal.malformed: a salt, a wrapping, a sealed key's box, a sealed
payload), the device's cryptography turns anything else into the general
failure, and so does every password cubit, the error logged by its type
alone.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
The device's answer takes what it is made for and the digest of what it
sets, as the register now requires: the new password (made before the old
one's proof, which binds it), the new phrase's wrapping and proof key, the
authenticator confirmed (the first or another) or removed, new recovery
codes, calling resets off, deleting, and asking for an authenticator's
reset apart from signing in. proof_digests.dart maps the protocol's objects
onto the shared framing; the key proof's password digest uses it too.
The fake gateway refuses a proof made for anything but the call's own
change, as the register does, so every flow's tests hold the repository to
it; the fake's authenticators have UUIDs, as the register's do.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
SRP's identity and the recovery phrase's proof carried the host alone, so
instances on one host under another port, path or scheme could relay each
other's proofs (the full reading's device low 4). Both now carry the base
URL the device addresses, written alike on both sides
(canonicalInstanceUrl: scheme and host in lower case, the port only where
it isn't the scheme's own, the path ending in /); the register takes its
own public scheme, host and port (Serverpod serves at the root), a member
the URL it names, development anything.
The identity also gains a purpose and the digest of what a proof sets,
both empty so far (signing in), with the framing for a new phrase's and an
authenticator's digest beside the new password's: the owner's proofs bind
them next. Cross-tests hold both sides to the same bytes. OwnerProof's and
DeletionProof's host, and every endpoint's, become instanceUrl.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
The fourth reading's second finding: a stolen session outlived the reset
of the authenticators (carrying it out ended no session) and confirmed
the account's first authenticator on its own code alone, ahead of the
owner, so the owner's confirmation and sign-in were refused after.
- Carrying out a reset of the authenticators ends every session of the
account, on the register at once and on every member by notice, as the
other resets do; the sign-in that carries it out gets its session after
that moment (PasswordProof.sessionsEndedBefore, issueSessionAfter).
- Confirming the first authenticator takes the password's proof for a
change's challenge, without a code (proveOwnersPassword), counted per
session as the owner's proofs are: a session of a lost phone, or of a
setup never finished, claims no second factor.
The app sends the password with every confirmation: the sign-up's, a
reset's and the account section's (which asks for it), and a sign-in's
own unlock where the session is still held back.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
The app's side of the owner's proof (OwnerProof, the third reading): adding
an authenticator once one is confirmed, removing a confirmed one and new
recovery codes now ask for the current password beside the code, as
changing the password, a new phrase and deleting already did; one
challenge and one answer per sheet (OwnerAnswer). A wrong password or code
reads as the one refusal the instance gives.
Deleting chooses a code by mail from what the instance says
(secondFactorWorks), no longer from whether an authenticator was ever
confirmed: with the authenticators' reset taken effect but not carried
out, the app offered a code field the instance refused (the fourth
finding). Signed-in calls take no address any more, so a device that
doesn't know it changes the password as any other; deleting by mail asks
for the address only where the device doesn't know it, as the code goes
there (the fifth finding).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
An account whose setup never finished, or whose authenticators' reset took
effect, could not delete itself (the re-review's eighth finding): deletion
asked for a TOTP or recovery code it had no way to give. Such an account
now deletes itself with the password's proof and a code by mail to its
address asked for deleting (EmailCodePurpose.deletion, which nothing else
takes), the address checked against the account's as everywhere after the
password; an account whose second factor works still takes a code from it.
The app's deletion sheet asks for the password and mails the code there,
then takes it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
Codes by mail were tied to nothing but their address (the re-review's
seventh finding): a hostile instance could answer that a setup never
finished, have the person type a code into it, relay it to start the real
instance's account reset, and 72 hours later relay a second to finish it
with its own password and keys; the mail said "to sign in" whatever the
code was for. A code is now asked for a purpose (signUp, finishSetup,
authenticatorReset, accountReset, deletion), only that purpose takes it (any
other is refused as no longer valid, leaving the code as it was), and its
mail says what it would do ("to reset your account on learn.halkyon.eu: a
new password and new keys, and what was encrypted with the old ones is
lost") and to type it only in the app on that instance, nowhere else. The
app asks for each code with the purpose of its step.
Migration (module, Learn's and Todo's servers, Learn's device schema):
ALTER TABLE "email_code_request" ADD COLUMN "purpose" text; nullable,
so the requests of the last 15 minutes before it stay, taken by nothing
and forgotten within the hour.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
Whoever guessed codes decided whether the owner was mailed (the re-review's
fourth finding): the address a sign-in sent was optional, so a guesser left
it out and no mail went, and a wait begun without a mail used up the one
mail there was. Every call carrying a code after the password or the phrase
proved (signing in, the phrase's reset, a change of password, a new phrase,
deletion) now takes the account's address and the language of its mails,
and is refused (wrongCredentials, as anything wrong after the password)
before any code is checked when the address isn't the account's; every
wait mails the owner, not only the first. The app sends the address the
person typed, or for changes while signed in the one this device signed in
with, and says so where it doesn't know it (addressUnknown).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
A session alone deleted any account, with everything encrypted under its
keys (the second reading's lows; decided by the developer: the password
and a code, as a change of password takes). account.delete now takes a
DeletionProof (the password's SRP proof for a beginChange challenge, a
TOTP or recovery code, the host the device addressed); the register
checks it (requireOwnerToDelete), a member passing it on bound to its own
host. Accounts without a password, anonymous ones among them, delete with
their session as before. In the app, deleting an account with a password
asks for it and a code in a sheet of its own; a wrong one deletes
nothing.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
The register can't check a password it never sees, and should its
database leak, the verifier and the keys wrapped under the password fall
to guessing at Argon2id's cost (the second reading's M8). Devices now
refuse a new password shorter than 12 characters, counted as code points
once normalised (halkyon_keys' checkNewPassword), at sign-up, a reset
keeping the keys and a change alike, before anything is derived; the new
password's field says so, and the refusal has its own text (en, de).
Signing in takes any length, so a password set before keeps working.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
Nothing tied a sign-in's proof to the instance it was made for: an
instance a person was lured into adding could pass A, M1 and the code on
to the real register and get a session there, and pass a phrase's proof
on with a password of its own in place of the person's (the second
reading's M6). SRP's identity is now a label, the challenge's ID and
the host the device addressed (passwordIdentity, in halkyon_base_client
and halkyon_base_server alike), and the phrase's proof signs that host,
what it is for (an authenticator's reset or a new password) and the new
password's digest (key proof v2). Every proving call carries the host;
in production it must be the server's apiServer.publicHost (otherwise
otherInstance, which the app shows as an instance it can't trust), in
development any; a member forwards its own. The tests prove that a
relayed sign-in, a proof for another host or purpose, and a swapped
password are refused, nothing changing.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
A key proof was a signature by the account's signing key, which every
signed-in device keeps in its keyring: whoever could read one, with a
code from its authenticator, set a new password without the password or
the phrase (the second reading's H1). The phrase now proves itself with
an Ed25519 key derived from its bits alone (halkyon_keys'
recoveryProofKeysOf, KDF context hlkrprf1, a sibling of the recovery
key), whose public half every setup, new phrase and account reset sends
and the register keeps (account_password.recoveryProofKey); the device
derives the secret half only while the phrase is typed. An account
without one (none exist outside development) proves no phrase until it
sets a new one; decoys check against a decoy proof key alike.
Migration (module, Learn's and Todo's servers, Learn's device schema):
ALTER TABLE "account_password" ADD COLUMN "recoveryProofKey" bytea;
nullable, so rows made before keep working and no data is touched.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
PasswordKdf.fromJson refused costs below the floor but took any above it,
so an instance could ask a device for 100 GiB and crash the app at every
sign-in. It now refuses more than the register's own ceiling (16 passes,
1 GiB; KeyRefusal.excessivePasswordKdf), and the app reads either refusal,
before deriving or sending anything, as PasswordProblem.unsafeCosts with
a text of its own (before, costs below the floor read as keys missing).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
password.setRecoveryKeys took a session and a TOTP code alone, so a phone
signed in with its authenticator beside it could set a phrase of its
holder's own and, through the phrase's reset, a new password, never
knowing the old one. It now takes the old password's SRP proof (from
beginChange, the caller's own) and a TOTP or recovery code, as changing
the password does: one owner proof for both (_proveOwner), forwarded by
members, asked for in the account section's New recovery phrase.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
ADR 0017, step 3: halkyon_app's side, which Learn and Todo take.
- The account's cryptography on the device (`SodiumAccountCrypto`):
halkyon_keys and SRP's client half, each step on an isolate of its
own. sodium hands out results as views of native memory its
finalizers free once the isolate that made them ends, so everything
crossing back is copied first: a view read freed memory and crashed
the process.
- `PasswordGateway` on the module's endpoints (steps without a session
through a client holding none; an authenticator set up with a session
granted but not yet the device's), and `PasswordRepository` running
the flows: signing in (M2 checked, the keys opened before anything is
trusted), signing up, a password for someone signed in, an account
never finished, the authenticators, recovery codes, changing the
password, a new recovery phrase, and getting back in.
- The unlocked keys in the system's keyring per instance and person
(`SecureAccountKeyStore`), gone once another person signs in or
nobody, and with the instance's removal.
- The screens: the start screen's Sign in and Create an account (and
when GitHub sign-in ends), the sign-in sheet (codes, recovery codes,
an account never finished, a lost authenticator), the account's setup
(the recovery phrase shown once, three random words typed back before
anything reaches the instance; the authenticator's QR code, drawn
with pub.dev's qr; the recovery codes), getting back in, and the
account section (`AccountSecuritySection`).
- `FileSaver` moves from Learn into halkyon_app, for the phrase and the
codes in Todo too; `AppDependencies` names it and `passwords`.
- halkyon_keys rebuilds account keys from the secret keys a device kept;
the key proof's message is in halkyon_base_client, checked against
the register's.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tizian 「ティツィアーン」 <raisondetredev@pm.me>
